Weaponizing the Adult Abuse Act: Anthony Friedman d/b/a v Albert B. Pepper Jr. (case 2611-PN00554)

Reckless Incompetence - How a litigant pro se "Out Lawyered" Super Lawyer Anthony R. Friedman with factual rigor and arguments unassailable

Reprint from Quora: (Not) Anthony R. Friedman attorney

By:

Dylan Mcdaniels

Citizen Journalist - Consumer Advocate: Phoenix Rising Productions LLC .Jul 10

It staggers the imagination how an attorney who presents themselves as a "Super Lawyer" could be so reckless in their pleadings and petitions that a pro se litigant having no formal legal education or credentials could undermine the arguments and evidentiary foundation of the petition. - Yet, it happened. - Anthony R. Friedman (Petitioner) v Albert B. Pepper Jr. (Respondent) case #2611-PN00554 11th Judicial Circuit St. Charles (Saint Charles) County Missouri.

Read the full story in detail on Reddit:

https://www.reddit.com/r/StCharlesMO/s/7yrkN0e0ii

For the full evidentiary package with exhibits of the Ex Parte Application filed by Anthony R. Friedman, Petitioner naming Albert B. Pepper Jr. as Respondent it has been preserved and archived on Academia Edu:

https://www.academia.edu/169425353/Weaponizing_the_Adult_Abuse_Act_Abuse_of_Process_Prior_Restraint_and_Professional_Candor_Violations_in_Anthony_R_Friedman_v_Albert_B_Pepper

Herein is the Abstract: Weaponizing the Adult Abuse Act: Abuse of Process, Prior Restraint, and Professional Candor Violations in Anthony R. Friedman v. Albert B. Pepper

Reckless Conduct in Desperation - Anthony R. Friedman, Personal Injury Attorney, 2026

Abuse of Process, Malicious Prosecution, Perjury, Fraud Upon the Court, Libel per se, Multiple Violations of the Missouri Model Rules of Professional Conduct by a Sworn Officer of the Court - Anthony R. Friedman Mo. Bar #65531 d/b/a/ Friedman Law Firm LLC St. Louis (Saint Louis), St. Charles (Saint Charles)

Herein is the Ex Parte Order of Protection filed by Anthony R. Friedman (Petitioner) on April 9, 2026 naming Albert B. Pepper Jr (Respondent) in the 11th Judicial Circuit in St. Charles County Missouri.

This reckless filing, in an act of desperation by Friedman the Petition was an act of attempting to secure a "prior restraint" upon the consumer advocacy and citizen journalism of Pepper and his social media expose with regard to the business and professional conduct, misconduct of Friedman the Petitioner.

On May 13, 2026 a motion hearing was held in Div. 12 of the 11th Judicial Circuit of St. Charles County before the Hon. William Byrnes.

After review of Friedmans petition, Peppers responsive answer, Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice and oral arguments rendered by Friedman and Pepper Judge Byrnes granted Peppers Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice in full without any amendments or stipulations.

This Petition for an Ex Parte Order of Protection is now presented for review and legal analysis to expose the multitude of allegations that were found to be without a basis in fact and the recklessness of the petition that has nor resulted in a supplemental filing with the Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of Missouri (File #25-2531-X).

Furthermore, the respondent, Pepper is now proceeding to prepare a complaint and evidentiary package for allegations of perjury naming Anthony R. Friedman to be presented to the St. Charles County Prosecuting Attorney for review seeking formal charges and prosecution.

The following web url's are to the archive(s) or Respondents Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice that was granted by Hon. William Byrnes and an image of the judges order rendered on May 13, 2026.

(Not) The Friedman Law Firm Saint Charles: Not the Friedman Law Firm Saint Charles Saint Louis

Academia Edu: https://www.academia.edu/167156729/Master_Respondents_Motion_To_Dismiss_Case_2611_PN00554_This_PDF_is_a_Maste

For further information and context: (Not) The Friedman Law Firm LLC:

notthefriedmanlawfirmllc.org

Ladies and gentlemen if you have found this page you are off to a most wonderful educational adventure into the world of personal injury law . This site has been established for the purpose of consumer awareness and consumer advocacy for those who have been injured and are now seeking or have already retained counsel to obtain compensation. What you may find most intriguing about this site is that I, a plaintiff litigant in a medical malpractice complaint that lasted four years is going to unpack all of the elements of the case beginning with the retaining of an attorney to the conclusion of the matter. This will be a “case study” of how the events unfolded so that you may become aware during your own case litigation of any “red flags” that may arise that the case may not be proceeding as you had anticipated. As this website is being built there will be a multitude of resources being added that will enhance your understanding as a plaintiff of the process. Many of which are as follows: Dictionary / Lexicon of common legal terms and phrases specific to personal injury law. How you can use Artificial Intelligence throughout litigation as your own personal assistant and paralegal. The primary focus and case analysis will be the conduct of Anthony R. Friedman now dba. The Friedman Law Firm llc. when he was employed by a large law firm and acting as lead counsel in a medical malpractice case entitled “Pepper v Gelfand m.d.” that was tried in the 21st judicial district of St. Louis County, MIssouri. Herein is a clue as to the results of Anthony R. Friedman acting as lead counsel – In conclusion, this site, the information and allegations made will be fact based and substantially objective in support of the facts and allegations. However, I the author and as a plaintiff who has himself been injured by the conduct, misconduct of legal counsel had a personal and emotional investment in the case and as I develop the narrative and tell the story of my experience there will indeed be elements of a subjective nature. I am making my appeal and presentation to the consumer. To the general public at large of which I myself am a part. It is a drama unfolding and there will be elements of intrigue and betrayal, of grief and amusement. I will enjoy telling my story and I hope you both enjoy and find some affinity with it as well. Bookmark this page and I would also invite you to participate in it’s development. If you have had a bad experience with a former or current attorney of which you believe that the consumer and public at large should be aware of please share it to protect other consumers and to hold such attorneys, law firms accountable. Thank you for your participation. Albert B. Pepper Jr. – litigant pro se The consumer interest and advocacy elements of this website are not presented as an exhaustive resource but rather, is intended to act as a foundation or supplement to your own research. To act as a nexus, a daysman, a fellow sojourner to treat var

https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAESXQHuR6pNooACcrefOT2Ry2wpPl3G7H7Dqkm3K25X1Q2

KKcW70-arklotWAgPaOKfss9h4N2FQbrXMONIugyxLVUqA7FadlfuFjyiVBFMciBUo5uWjzMyjdulsiVgFA==